Australia moved Sunday to bar any refugee or asylum-seeker who
arrives in the country illegally by boat from ever being able to apply
for a visa, even as tourists or for business.
The lifetime ban will be put to parliament when it next sits, with
Prime Minister Malcolm Turnbull saying it was necessary to send an
“absolutely, unflinching, unequivocal message” that boatpeople will
never be allowed in Australia.
“This is a battle of will between the Australian people, represented
by its government, and the criminal gangs of people-smugglers,” he said.
“You should not underestimate the scale of the threat. These
people-smugglers are the worst criminals imaginable. They have a
multibillion-dollar business.
“We have to be very determined to say no to their criminal plans.”
Amendments to the migration act would be backdated to mid-2013, when
former Labor prime minister Kevin Rudd declared: “As of today,
asylum-seekers who come here by boat without a visa will never be
settled in Australia.”
Canberra currently sends all boatpeople to offshore processing camps
on the Pacific islands of Nauru and Papua New Guinea’s Manus.
They are already blocked from being resettled in Australia even if
found to be genuine refugees. They can either return home, make a life
on Manus or Nauru, or go to a third country.
The new legislation would affect those sent to Nauru and Manus from
19 July, 2013, including those who have returned home, and anyone who
arrives in the future.
But children will be exempt and the immigration minister would have the power to make exceptions.
The Nauru facility holds just over 400 men, women and children.
Some 800 men are detained on Manus, which Australia in August agreed
to close after a Papua New Guinea court ruling that holding people there
was unconstitutional and illegal.
Rights group have alleged there is widespread abuse and self-harm in the camps.
Turnbull said the move would reinforce to refugee advocates still
hoping Australia will accept some of those on Nauru or Manus that it
will never happen.
“We have one of the most generous humanitarian programs in the world,” he said.
“But the only reason we can do it, the only reason it has the public
acceptance that it does, is because we are in command of our borders.”
Australia has boosted its annual humanitarian refugee intake in
recent years from 13,750 to 18,750, and has also agreed to take 12,000
displaced in Syria and Iraq.
Grave concerns
Refugee advocates said the plan was unacceptable, with Save the
Children fearing it will further exacerbate the mental anguish of those
held in the Pacific camps.
“We have grave concerns that this kind of announcement will push
people over the edge,” said the organisation’s director of policy and
public advocacy in Australia Mat Tinkler.
“The government must act urgently to give hope to these people, not continue to take it away.”
Refugee and Immigration Legal Centre lawyer David Manne agreed that the proposal punished genuine refugees.
“This does nothing to address that fundamental question about where
they are going to be taken so that they can rebuild their lives in
safety and with dignity,” he told the Australian Broadcasting
Corporation.
Since the start of “Operation Sovereign Borders” in September 2013,
the conservative government has managed to halt the flood of boat
arrivals, and drownings, that characterised previous Labor
administrations.
Labor said Sunday it had yet to decide whether to back the visa ban.
Source : http://en.prothom-alo.com/international/news/127085/Lifetime-ban-from-Australia-for-refugees-arriving

No comments:
Post a Comment